Governing community-based natural resource management in australia: International implications

Allan Dale*, Karen Vella, Sarah Ryan, Kathleen Broderick, Rosemary Hill, Ruth Potts, Tom Brewer

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    14 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Community-based natural resource management (CBNRM) has grown in stature as a key component of many national natural resource and rural development governance systems. Despite their growth, the integrity of CBNRM governance systems has rarely been analysed in a national context. To enhance dialogue about how best to design and deploy such systems nationally, this paper analyses the Australian system in detail. The Australian system was selected because the nation has a globally recognised and strong history of CBNRM approaches. We first contextualise the international emergence of national CBRM governance systems before analysing the Australian system. We find that a theoretically informed approach recognising regions as the anchors in brokering multi-scale CBNRM was applied between 2000 and 2007. Subsequent policy, while strengthening indigenous roles, has tended to weaken regional brokering, Commonwealth-state cooperation and research collaboration. Our findings and consequent emerging lessons can inform Australian policy makers and other nations looking to establish (or to reform existing) CBNRM governance systems. Equally, the research approach taken represents the application of an emerging new theoretical framework for analysing complex governance systems.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number234
    JournalLand
    Volume9
    Issue number7
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jul 2020

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Governing community-based natural resource management in australia: International implications'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this