Governing for the mainstream: Implications for community representation

Marian Sawer*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    44 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    In this paper I begin by examining the role of extra-parliamentary institutions of representation within Australian democracy. I suggest that such institutions are an important supplement to majoritarian political institutions in ensuring that 'weak voices' are heard in the policy process. I then look at the impact of the Howard government on such extra parliamentary forms of community representation, drawing parallels with contemporaneous developments in Canada. I find that changes were in fact initiated under Labor governments, seeking to impose managerialist models on community-based representation. The further controls introduced by the Howard government have, however, seriously reduced the capacity of community-based peak bodies to represent their constituencies. These constraints create the danger of a less inclusive democracy, where the voices of those outside the mainstream can be ignored or misrepresented.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)39-49
    Number of pages11
    JournalAustralian Journal of Public Administration
    Volume61
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Mar 2002

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Governing for the mainstream: Implications for community representation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this