Abstract
In this paper I begin by examining the role of extra-parliamentary institutions of representation within Australian democracy. I suggest that such institutions are an important supplement to majoritarian political institutions in ensuring that 'weak voices' are heard in the policy process. I then look at the impact of the Howard government on such extra parliamentary forms of community representation, drawing parallels with contemporaneous developments in Canada. I find that changes were in fact initiated under Labor governments, seeking to impose managerialist models on community-based representation. The further controls introduced by the Howard government have, however, seriously reduced the capacity of community-based peak bodies to represent their constituencies. These constraints create the danger of a less inclusive democracy, where the voices of those outside the mainstream can be ignored or misrepresented.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 39-49 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Australian Journal of Public Administration |
| Volume | 61 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Mar 2002 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Governing for the mainstream: Implications for community representation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver