Grand Designs? The 'Managerial' Role of Ministers Within Westminster-Based Public Management Policy

Michael Di Francesco*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article explores the design of public management policies in Westminster-based systems, with a focus on Australia. It argues that orthodox analysis of public management policy is deficient in two ways: first, policy change directed at bureaucratic structures tends to ignore the critical role that ministers must play in making 'management' reforms work; second, such policy change tends to assume away key 'inherencies' that inhibit behavioural changes in politicians that might otherwise be expected from enhanced management structures. The article examines the under-conceptualised managerial role that requires ministers to be an integral part of departmental leadership, and contends that key aspects of public management - in particular, performance control - are dependent on this ministerial role orientation becoming more prominent. In effect, the article raises a public management 'heresy' by profiling the need for ministers to conform more with their own prescriptions for improved management.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)257-268
Number of pages12
JournalAustralian Journal of Public Administration
Volume71
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Grand Designs? The 'Managerial' Role of Ministers Within Westminster-Based Public Management Policy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this