Abstract
This article explores the design of public management policies in Westminster-based systems, with a focus on Australia. It argues that orthodox analysis of public management policy is deficient in two ways: first, policy change directed at bureaucratic structures tends to ignore the critical role that ministers must play in making 'management' reforms work; second, such policy change tends to assume away key 'inherencies' that inhibit behavioural changes in politicians that might otherwise be expected from enhanced management structures. The article examines the under-conceptualised managerial role that requires ministers to be an integral part of departmental leadership, and contends that key aspects of public management - in particular, performance control - are dependent on this ministerial role orientation becoming more prominent. In effect, the article raises a public management 'heresy' by profiling the need for ministers to conform more with their own prescriptions for improved management.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 257-268 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Australian Journal of Public Administration |
| Volume | 71 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Sept 2012 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Grand Designs? The 'Managerial' Role of Ministers Within Westminster-Based Public Management Policy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver