TY - JOUR
T1 - Grazing management for soil carbon in Australia
T2 - A review
AU - McDonald, Sarah E.
AU - Badgery, Warwick
AU - Clarendon, Simon
AU - Orgill, Susan
AU - Sinclair, Katrina
AU - Meyer, Rachelle
AU - Butchart, Dominique Bowen
AU - Eckard, Richard
AU - Rowlings, David
AU - Grace, Peter
AU - Doran-Browne, Natalie
AU - Harden, Steven
AU - Macdonald, Ainslie
AU - Wellington, Michael
AU - Pachas, Anibal Nahuel Alejandro
AU - Eisner, Rowan
AU - Amidy, Martin
AU - Harrison, Matthew Tom
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors
PY - 2023/12/1
Y1 - 2023/12/1
N2 - The livestock industry accounts for a considerable proportion of agricultural greenhouse gas emissions, and in response, the Australian red meat industry has committed to an aspirational target of net-zero emissions by 2030. Increasing soil carbon storage in grazing lands has been identified as one method to help achieve this, while also potentially improving production and provision of other ecosystem services. This review examined the effects of grazing management on soil carbon and factors that drive soil carbon sequestration in Australia. A systematic literature search and meta-analysis was used to compare effects of stocking intensity (stocking rate or utilisation) and stocking method (i.e, continuous, rotational or seasonal grazing systems) on soil organic carbon, pasture herbage mass, plant growth and ground cover. Impacts on below ground biomass, soil nitrogen and soil structure are also discussed. Overall, no significant impact of stocking intensity or method on soil carbon sequestration in Australia was found, although lower stocking intensity and incorporating periods of rest into grazing systems (rotational grazing) had positive effects on herbage mass and ground cover compared with higher stocking intensity or continuous grazing. Minimal impact of grazing management on pasture growth rate and below-ground biomass has been reported in Australia. However, these factors improved with grazing intensity or rotational grazing in some circumstances. While there is a lack of evidence in Australia that grazing management directly increases soil carbon, this meta-analysis indicated that grazing management practices have potential to benefit the drivers of soil carbon sequestration by increasing above and below-ground plant production, maintaining a higher residual biomass, and promoting productive perennial pasture species. Specific recommendations for future research and management are provided in the paper.
AB - The livestock industry accounts for a considerable proportion of agricultural greenhouse gas emissions, and in response, the Australian red meat industry has committed to an aspirational target of net-zero emissions by 2030. Increasing soil carbon storage in grazing lands has been identified as one method to help achieve this, while also potentially improving production and provision of other ecosystem services. This review examined the effects of grazing management on soil carbon and factors that drive soil carbon sequestration in Australia. A systematic literature search and meta-analysis was used to compare effects of stocking intensity (stocking rate or utilisation) and stocking method (i.e, continuous, rotational or seasonal grazing systems) on soil organic carbon, pasture herbage mass, plant growth and ground cover. Impacts on below ground biomass, soil nitrogen and soil structure are also discussed. Overall, no significant impact of stocking intensity or method on soil carbon sequestration in Australia was found, although lower stocking intensity and incorporating periods of rest into grazing systems (rotational grazing) had positive effects on herbage mass and ground cover compared with higher stocking intensity or continuous grazing. Minimal impact of grazing management on pasture growth rate and below-ground biomass has been reported in Australia. However, these factors improved with grazing intensity or rotational grazing in some circumstances. While there is a lack of evidence in Australia that grazing management directly increases soil carbon, this meta-analysis indicated that grazing management practices have potential to benefit the drivers of soil carbon sequestration by increasing above and below-ground plant production, maintaining a higher residual biomass, and promoting productive perennial pasture species. Specific recommendations for future research and management are provided in the paper.
KW - Biomass
KW - Carbon neutral
KW - Grazing intensity
KW - Grazing strategy
KW - Livestock
KW - Production
KW - Sequestration
KW - Soil organic carbon
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85174047532&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119146
DO - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119146
M3 - Review article
SN - 0301-4797
VL - 347
JO - Journal of Environmental Management
JF - Journal of Environmental Management
M1 - 119146
ER -