TY - JOUR
T1 - Groups 4 Health versus cognitive-behavioural therapy for depression and loneliness in young people
T2 - Randomised phase 3 non-inferiority trial with 12-month follow-up
AU - Cruwys, Tegan
AU - Haslam, Catherine
AU - Rathbone, Joanne A.
AU - Williams, Elyse
AU - Haslam, S. Alexander
AU - Walter, Zoe C.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists.
PY - 2022/3/3
Y1 - 2022/3/3
N2 - Background Depression treatments are typically less effective for young people than for adults. However, treatments rarely target loneliness, which is a key risk factor in the onset, maintenance and development of depression. Aims This study evaluated the efficacy of a novel loneliness intervention, Groups 4 Health (G4H), relative to the best-practice treatment of cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) in reducing loneliness and depression over a 12-month period (Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry: ACTRN12618000440224). Method The study was a phase 3 randomised non-inferiority trial comparing G4H with dose-controlled group CBT. Participants were 174 people aged 15-25 years experiencing loneliness and clinically significant symptoms of depression, who were not in receipt of adjunct treatment. Participants were recruited from mental health services in Southeast Queensland, Australia. Randomisation was conducted using computer software. Follow-up assessments and statistical analyses were masked to allocation. Both interventions consisted of five 75 min group-based psychotherapy sessions. The primary outcomes were depression and loneliness, with a non-inferiority margin of 2.20 for depression. Results The trial enrolled 174 participants between 24 April 2018 and 25 May 2019, with 84 in the G4H condition and 90 in the CBT condition. All randomised participants were included in the intention-to-treat analyses (n = 174). The pre-post effect sizes for depression were dG4H = -0.71 and dCBT = -0.91. For loneliness, they were dG4H = -1.07 and dCBT = -0.89. At 12-month follow-up, the absolute difference between groups on depression was 1.176 (95% CI -1.94 to 4.29) and on loneliness it was -0.679 (95% CI -1.43 to 0.07). No adverse effects were observed. Conclusions G4H was non-inferior to CBT for depression and showed a slight advantage over CBT for loneliness that emerged after treatment completion.
AB - Background Depression treatments are typically less effective for young people than for adults. However, treatments rarely target loneliness, which is a key risk factor in the onset, maintenance and development of depression. Aims This study evaluated the efficacy of a novel loneliness intervention, Groups 4 Health (G4H), relative to the best-practice treatment of cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) in reducing loneliness and depression over a 12-month period (Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry: ACTRN12618000440224). Method The study was a phase 3 randomised non-inferiority trial comparing G4H with dose-controlled group CBT. Participants were 174 people aged 15-25 years experiencing loneliness and clinically significant symptoms of depression, who were not in receipt of adjunct treatment. Participants were recruited from mental health services in Southeast Queensland, Australia. Randomisation was conducted using computer software. Follow-up assessments and statistical analyses were masked to allocation. Both interventions consisted of five 75 min group-based psychotherapy sessions. The primary outcomes were depression and loneliness, with a non-inferiority margin of 2.20 for depression. Results The trial enrolled 174 participants between 24 April 2018 and 25 May 2019, with 84 in the G4H condition and 90 in the CBT condition. All randomised participants were included in the intention-to-treat analyses (n = 174). The pre-post effect sizes for depression were dG4H = -0.71 and dCBT = -0.91. For loneliness, they were dG4H = -1.07 and dCBT = -0.89. At 12-month follow-up, the absolute difference between groups on depression was 1.176 (95% CI -1.94 to 4.29) and on loneliness it was -0.679 (95% CI -1.43 to 0.07). No adverse effects were observed. Conclusions G4H was non-inferior to CBT for depression and showed a slight advantage over CBT for loneliness that emerged after treatment completion.
KW - Social identity
KW - adolescence
KW - group psychotherapy
KW - mental health
KW - mood disorders
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85115120803&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1192/bjp.2021.128
DO - 10.1192/bjp.2021.128
M3 - Article
SN - 0007-1250
VL - 220
SP - 140
EP - 147
JO - British Journal of Psychiatry
JF - British Journal of Psychiatry
IS - 3
ER -