Happiness and the human development index: Australia is not a paradox

Andrew Leigh*, Justin Wolfers

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    58 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    In 'Happiness and the Human Development Index: The Paradox of Australia', Blanchflower and Oswald (2005) observe an apparent puzzle: they claim that Australia ranks highly in the Human Development Index (HDI), but relatively poorly in happiness. However, when we compare their happiness data with the HDI, Australia appears happier, not sadder, than its HDI score would predict. This conclusion also holds when we turn to a larger cross-national dataset than the one used by Blanchflower and Oswald, when we analyse life satisfaction in place of happiness, and when we measure development using Gross Domestic Product per capita in place of the HDI. Indeed, in the World Values Survey, only one other country (Iceland) has a significantly higher level of both life satisfaction and happiness than Australia. Our findings accord with numerous cross-national surveys conducted since the 1940s, which have consistently found that Australians report high levels of well-being.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)176-184
    Number of pages9
    JournalAustralian Economic Review
    Volume39
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jun 2006

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Happiness and the human development index: Australia is not a paradox'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this