TY - JOUR
T1 - Harmonizing quality measures of FAIRness assessment towards machine-actionable quality information
AU - Peng, Ge
AU - Berg-Cross, Gary
AU - Wu, Mingfang
AU - Downs, Robert R.
AU - Shrestha, Sudhir R.
AU - Wyborn, Lesley
AU - Ritchey, Nancy
AU - Ramapriyan, Hampapuram K.
AU - Clark, S. Jeanette
AU - Wood, Jenny
AU - Liu, Zhong
AU - Marouane, Abdelhak
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - FAIR Principles are a set of high-level guidelines for sharing digital resources. The growing global adoption of the FAIR Principles by policymakers, funders, and organizations compels data professionals, projects, and repositories to demonstrate the level of FAIR-compliance (referred to as FAIRness) of their digital data, metadata, and infrastructures. Because the FAIR Principles offer general objectives rather than specific implementation instructions, discrepancies exist due to different interpretations, domain-specific requirements, and intended applications. These discrepancies hinder direct comparisons and integration of assessment outcomes. To address this issue, we propose a novel framework, including a consolidated FAIR vocabulary. This framework establishes quality measures upfront in FAIRness assessment workflows to surpass the intricacies arising from the aforementioned dependencies. The established quality measures encapsulate the distinctive core concepts inherent in individual FAIR principles and can serve as common, fundamental pillars of holistic FAIRness assessment workflows. Building upon this fundamental set of the quality measures, we introduce a FAIRness quality maturity matrix (FAIR-QMM) as a structured, tiered, and progressive approach for evaluating and reporting the degree of FAIR-compliance. The FAIR-QMM can be used as a FAIRness assessment tool independently and/or as a translator between other FAIRness assessment tools or models.
AB - FAIR Principles are a set of high-level guidelines for sharing digital resources. The growing global adoption of the FAIR Principles by policymakers, funders, and organizations compels data professionals, projects, and repositories to demonstrate the level of FAIR-compliance (referred to as FAIRness) of their digital data, metadata, and infrastructures. Because the FAIR Principles offer general objectives rather than specific implementation instructions, discrepancies exist due to different interpretations, domain-specific requirements, and intended applications. These discrepancies hinder direct comparisons and integration of assessment outcomes. To address this issue, we propose a novel framework, including a consolidated FAIR vocabulary. This framework establishes quality measures upfront in FAIRness assessment workflows to surpass the intricacies arising from the aforementioned dependencies. The established quality measures encapsulate the distinctive core concepts inherent in individual FAIR principles and can serve as common, fundamental pillars of holistic FAIRness assessment workflows. Building upon this fundamental set of the quality measures, we introduce a FAIRness quality maturity matrix (FAIR-QMM) as a structured, tiered, and progressive approach for evaluating and reporting the degree of FAIR-compliance. The FAIR-QMM can be used as a FAIRness assessment tool independently and/or as a translator between other FAIRness assessment tools or models.
KW - FAIR
KW - FAIRness assessment
KW - FAIRness quality maturity matrix
KW - quality measure
KW - scientific data
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85202032935&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/17538947.2024.2390431
DO - 10.1080/17538947.2024.2390431
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85202032935
SN - 1753-8947
VL - 17
JO - International Journal of Digital Earth
JF - International Journal of Digital Earth
IS - 1
M1 - 2390431
ER -