He who would not be muzzled: Justice Heydon's last dissent in Monis v The Queen (2013)

Gabrielle Appleby, Heather Roberts

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

By 2013, the time of his final judgement in Monis v. The Queen ('Monis'), Heydon J had established a reputation for being a lone and somewhat curmudgeonly dissenting voice on the High Court. At his retirement, his disagreement and disappointment with the Court's increasing departure from traditional, formalistic judicial method was well documented in a series of increasingly acerbic judgments. This was not the voice that had first spoken from the bench in 2003, at a time when there was a movement towards formalism and away from the reasoning and doctrines of the Mason and Brennan Courts.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationGreat Australian Dissents
EditorsAndrew Lynch
Place of PublicationCambridge, United Kingdom
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages335-354
Volume1
Edition1st
ISBN (Print)9781107158535
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'He who would not be muzzled: Justice Heydon's last dissent in Monis v The Queen (2013)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this