Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

He who would not be muzzled: Justice Heydon's last dissent in Monis v The Queen (2013)

Gabrielle Appleby, Heather Roberts

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

    Abstract

    By 2013, the time of his final judgement in Monis v. The Queen ('Monis'), Heydon J had established a reputation for being a lone and somewhat curmudgeonly dissenting voice on the High Court. At his retirement, his disagreement and disappointment with the Court's increasing departure from traditional, formalistic judicial method was well documented in a series of increasingly acerbic judgments. This was not the voice that had first spoken from the bench in 2003, at a time when there was a movement towards formalism and away from the reasoning and doctrines of the Mason and Brennan Courts.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationGreat Australian Dissents
    EditorsAndrew Lynch
    Place of PublicationCambridge, United Kingdom
    PublisherCambridge University Press
    Pages335-354
    Volume1
    Edition1st
    ISBN (Print)9781107158535
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2016

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'He who would not be muzzled: Justice Heydon's last dissent in Monis v The Queen (2013)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this