Helper contributions in the cooperatively breeding laughing kookaburra: Feeding young is no laughing matter

Sarah Legge*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    67 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    I studied the contributions of individuals to incubation and nestling feeding in a population of cooperatively breeding laughing kookaburras, Dacelo novaeguineae. In most cooperatively breeding birds where nest success is limited by nestling starvation, related helpers increase the overall level of provisioning to the nest, thus boosting the production of nondescendent kin. However, although partial brood loss is the largest cause of lost productivity in kookaburra nests, additional helpers failed to increase overall provisioning. Instead, all group members, but especially helpers, reduced their feeding contributions as group size increased. Breeders and helpers reduced the size of prey delivered, and helpers also reduced the number of feeding visits. An important benefit of helping in kookaburras may be to allow all group members to reduce their effort. Within groups, contributions to care depended on status, sex, group size and the brood size. Breeding males delivered the most food. Breeding females provisioned less than their partner, but their effort was comparable to that of male helpers. Female helpers contributed the least food. Incubation effort followed similar patterns. The relatedness of helpers to the brood had no impact on their provisioning. Across all group sizes, helpers generally brought larger items to the nest than breeders. (C) 2000 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1009-1018
    Number of pages10
    JournalAnimal Behaviour
    Volume59
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2000

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Helper contributions in the cooperatively breeding laughing kookaburra: Feeding young is no laughing matter'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this