High court of Australia and HIV/AIDS disease criminalisation: Aubrey v the queen and zaburoni v the queen

Thomas Faunce*, Brendan Siles

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Abstract

    In 2017, the High Court of Australia in Aubrey v The Queen (2017) 91 ALJR 601; [2017] HCA 18 considered the term "inflict" grievous bodily harm, under common law, and expanded its interpretation to incorporate nonviolent and non-immediate infection of a disease, overturning a 120 year authority in R v Clarence (1888) 22 QBD 23. In the previous case of Zaburoni v The Queen (2016) 256 CLR 482; [2016] HCA 12, the High Court allowed an appeal from the Qld Supreme Court finding that repeated acts of unprotected sexual intercourse by a man who knew he was infected with HIV/AIDS, though callous and reckless, did not constitute intention to infect his female partner; consequently, he could be found guilty of a lesser offence of inflicting grievous bodily harm which carried a maximum 14-year prison sentence rather than life imprisonment. These decisions illustrate a court intersecting with an emerging trend to use legislation creating criminal offences to deter those who intentionally or recklessly infect others with life-shortening diseases. HIV/AIDS law; infectious disease law; criminal law; grievous bodily harm; intent to infect.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)52-61
    Number of pages10
    JournalJournal of law and medicine
    Volume25
    Issue number1
    Publication statusPublished - 2017

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'High court of Australia and HIV/AIDS disease criminalisation: Aubrey v the queen and zaburoni v the queen'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this