TY - JOUR
T1 - High court of Australia and HIV/AIDS disease criminalisation
T2 - Aubrey v the queen and zaburoni v the queen
AU - Faunce, Thomas
AU - Siles, Brendan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Thomson Head Office.
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - In 2017, the High Court of Australia in Aubrey v The Queen (2017) 91 ALJR 601; [2017] HCA 18 considered the term "inflict" grievous bodily harm, under common law, and expanded its interpretation to incorporate nonviolent and non-immediate infection of a disease, overturning a 120 year authority in R v Clarence (1888) 22 QBD 23. In the previous case of Zaburoni v The Queen (2016) 256 CLR 482; [2016] HCA 12, the High Court allowed an appeal from the Qld Supreme Court finding that repeated acts of unprotected sexual intercourse by a man who knew he was infected with HIV/AIDS, though callous and reckless, did not constitute intention to infect his female partner; consequently, he could be found guilty of a lesser offence of inflicting grievous bodily harm which carried a maximum 14-year prison sentence rather than life imprisonment. These decisions illustrate a court intersecting with an emerging trend to use legislation creating criminal offences to deter those who intentionally or recklessly infect others with life-shortening diseases. HIV/AIDS law; infectious disease law; criminal law; grievous bodily harm; intent to infect.
AB - In 2017, the High Court of Australia in Aubrey v The Queen (2017) 91 ALJR 601; [2017] HCA 18 considered the term "inflict" grievous bodily harm, under common law, and expanded its interpretation to incorporate nonviolent and non-immediate infection of a disease, overturning a 120 year authority in R v Clarence (1888) 22 QBD 23. In the previous case of Zaburoni v The Queen (2016) 256 CLR 482; [2016] HCA 12, the High Court allowed an appeal from the Qld Supreme Court finding that repeated acts of unprotected sexual intercourse by a man who knew he was infected with HIV/AIDS, though callous and reckless, did not constitute intention to infect his female partner; consequently, he could be found guilty of a lesser offence of inflicting grievous bodily harm which carried a maximum 14-year prison sentence rather than life imprisonment. These decisions illustrate a court intersecting with an emerging trend to use legislation creating criminal offences to deter those who intentionally or recklessly infect others with life-shortening diseases. HIV/AIDS law; infectious disease law; criminal law; grievous bodily harm; intent to infect.
KW - Criminal law
KW - Grievous bodily harm
KW - HIV/AIDS law
KW - Infectious disease law
KW - Intent to infect
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052182891&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Review article
SN - 1320-159X
VL - 25
SP - 52
EP - 61
JO - Journal of law and medicine
JF - Journal of law and medicine
IS - 1
ER -