Abstract
The reductive electrochemistry of the decaruthenium clusters [Ru10(μ-H)(μ6-C)(CO)24]- (1) and [Ru10(μ6-C)(CO)24]2- (2) has been examined by cyclic voltammetry and UV-Vis spectroelectrochemistry, the latter using an optically transparent thin-layer electrode (OTTLE) cell. Two-electron reduction of both 1 and 2 proceeds in an electrochemically non-reversible fashion to give #[HRu10(μ6-C) (CO)24]3- and #[Ru10(μ6-C) (CO)24]4-, respectively, with an associated structural change (indicated #) which is proposed to involve apical Ru-Ru bond cleavage. Two-electron oxidation of these electrochemically-generated species at low temperature proceeds in a reversible fashion to afford #[HRu10(μ6-C) (CO)24]- and #[Ru10(μ6-C) (CO)24]2-, respectively, with no further gross structural change, whereas two-electron oxidation at room temperature proceeds by way of apical Ru-Ru bond reformation to regenerate 1 and 2. The effect of the hydride ligand in the decaruthenium clusters is to favor reduction and disfavor oxidation by ∼0.3 V. Results with these clusters contrast with the reported behavior of stepwise reductions observed for isostructural [Os10(μ6-C) (CO)24]2-, where no structural adjustment was observed to accompany the first one-electron reduction, and only a minor change (cluster vertex expansion) accompanied the second one-electron reduction, differences between these systems being assigned to varying M-M bond strengths.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 273-280 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | Inorganica Chimica Acta |
Volume | 259 |
Issue number | 1-2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jun 1997 |