Abstract
Australian higher education funding policy has been a contentious and emotionally charged topic on the political agenda since the introduction of the Higher Education Contribution Scheme (HECS). Under HECS, students have options either to pay upfront or defer payment. This article examines the implications for the Australian Taxation Office, which has responsibility for debt collection among students who defer HECS payments. Results show that HECS debt undermines tax compliance directly, and indirectly through perceived injustice. The path model demonstrates how perceptions of government policy can shape cooperation with government in other spheres.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 121-136 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Law and Policy |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jan 2007 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Higher education loans and tax evasion: A response to perceived unfairness'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver