Hippocampus and amygdala volumes in a random community-based sample of 60-64 year olds and their relationship to cognition

Jerome J. Maller*, Kaarin J. Anstey, Chantal Réglade-Meslin, Helen Christensen, Wei Wen, Perminder Sachdev

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    42 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Reduced volumes of the hippocampus (HC) and amygdala (AG) are potential biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease (AD) and other neuropsychiatric disorders. Published studies on HC and AG volumes suffer from methodological limitations, and a valid and reliable normative database does not exist. This study aimed to establish a database of HC and AG volumes from a large community sample of participants 60-64 years old and relate them to cognition. A total of 452 randomly selected participants (from 622 approached) were retained in the study (238 males, 214 females), and all received brain MRI scans, as well as cognitive and physical assessments. HC and AG volumes were estimated from manual tracings on T1-weighted images, and intracranial volume (ICV) was obtained from an automated program. In both sexes, right hippocampi were larger than left, while left amygdalae were larger than right. The only correlation to remain significant after normalization was left HC volume and percent retention of a word list in females. This study provides a HC and AG volumetrics database and describes its relationship with cognitive performance in a representative sample using a standard methodology that will be a reference for future studies. It will therefore have clinical applicability in early AD and other disorders.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)185-197
    Number of pages13
    JournalPsychiatry Research - Neuroimaging
    Volume156
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 15 Dec 2007

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Hippocampus and amygdala volumes in a random community-based sample of 60-64 year olds and their relationship to cognition'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this