History and its racial legacies: Quotas in South African rugby and cricket

Christopher Merrett, Colin Tatz, Daryl Adair*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

South African identity has always been shaped by racial quotas; that is, divisions, assignments, allowances and allocations based on socially created ideas of race and difference. Both law and custom assigned a hierarchy which separated the rulers from the ruled, and allocated and rationed goods, services and enjoyments in all spheres of life, including sport. 'Superior' whites were layered above the Cape coloured people, followed by the Indian community and, lastly, the Africans, the black majority. This article looks briefly at the historical context of racial divisions and, with the downfall of apartheid, the rhetoric of an avowedly de-racialized 'new South Africa'. Given the chronic history of negative discrimination, it is understandable that affirmative action has become a major policy framework in the building of a post-apartheid society. But sport is a sobering example of how a domain can be 're-racialized' in this quest. How does the African National Congress justify the (re)introduction into sport of a proportional or numerical quota system based on racial categories? Is there a need for demographic representativeness in white-dominated sports like cricket and rugby, but seemingly not in black-dominated soccer? Is an arithmetic quota system not merely a logical extension of the reviled racial genres and divides of previous centuries?.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)754-777
Number of pages24
JournalSport in Society
Volume14
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'History and its racial legacies: Quotas in South African rugby and cricket'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this