Holding blame at bay Gene talk in family members accounts of schizophrenia aetiology

Felicity Callard*, Diana Rose, Emma Louise Hanif, Jody Quigley, Kathryn Greenwood, Til Wykes

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We provide the first detailed analysis of how, for what purposes and with what consequences people related to someone with a diagnosis of schizophrenia use gene talk. The article analyses findings from a qualitative interview study conducted in London and involving 19 participants (mostly women). We transcribed the interviews verbatim and analysed them using grounded theory methods. We analyse how and for what purposes participants mobilized gene talk in their affectively freighted encounter with an unknown interviewer. Gene talk served to (re)position blame and guilt, and was simultaneously used imaginatively to forge family history narratives. Family members used gene talk to recruit forebears with no psychiatric diagnosis into a family history of mental illness, and presented the origins of the diagnosed family member's schizophrenia as lying temporally before, and hence beyond the agency of the immediate family. Gene talk was also used in attempts to dislodge the distressing figure of the schizophrenia-inducing mother. Gene talk, however, ultimately displaced, rather than resolved, the (self-)blame of many family members, particularly mothers. Our article challenges the commonly expressed view that genetic accounts will absolve family members sense of (self-)blame in relation to their relative's/relatives diagnosis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)273-293
Number of pages21
JournalBioSocieties
Volume7
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Holding blame at bay Gene talk in family members accounts of schizophrenia aetiology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this