Holding ‘new recovery’ together: Organising relations and forms of coordination in professional sociomaterial practices of addiction recovery

Questions about what addiction recovery is and the mechanisms by which people ‘recover’ have long animated alcohol and other drug research and policy. These debates became even more intense following the advent, and increasing influence in some quarters, of the ‘new recovery’. Starting from the position that recovery is ontologically multiple (Mol & Law, 2002), we trace how alcohol and other drug professionals attempted to make sense of ‘new recovery’ as a concept and set of professional practices during a period of Australian drug treatment system reform. Drawing on Annemarie Mol's (2002) account of organising relations and forms of coordination (addition, translation and distribution), we explore how the new recovery was enacted and coordinated in alcohol and other drug professionals’ sociomaterial practices, and highlight the ontological work involved in holding such an unstable object together. First, we argue that the addition of multiple enactments of addiction and recovery contributed to the formation of a singular and serviceable problem (that was simultaneously heterogeneous and complex), making the ‘disease-to-be-treated’ amenable to diverse treatment approaches, including new recovery. Second, we analyse the role of metaphor in translating authoritative logics and obligations into an enactment of new recovery suitable for application in clinical settings. Lastly, we track how incompatible enactments of recovery, both new and old, were kept apart through distribution. Although new recovery ultimately failed to gain policy traction in the Australian context, we focus on the ontological work undertaken by professionals in response to its introduction as such case studies can be useful for analysing other powerfully governing policy objects and their operations.