How Citizens Judge Extreme Legislative Dissent: Experimental Evidence from Canada on Party Switching

John R. Mcandrews*, Feodor Snagovsky, Paul E.J. Thomas

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    2 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Prior research suggests that voters prefer legislators who dissent from their party (e.g. by speaking out or rebelling in legislative votes) to those who remain loyal to their party. We examine whether this preference extends to extreme instances of dissent where legislators switch parties. Using what we believe is the first survey experiment to examine party switching, we show that, overall, Canadian voters are not more likely to approve of an MP's decision to engage in this kind of extreme dissent than an MP who remains loyal to their party. Instead, respondents' support for party switching - and the inferences they draw about legislators' motivations for doing so - depend in predictable ways on their partisanship and policy attitudes. This suggests that there are important limits to voters' endorsement of independent-mindedness among legislators.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)323-341
    Number of pages19
    JournalParliamentary Affairs
    Volume73
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2020

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'How Citizens Judge Extreme Legislative Dissent: Experimental Evidence from Canada on Party Switching'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this