How does it feel to be visualized? Redistributing Ethics

David Moats*, Jessamy Perriam

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

What are the ethics of a network graph? Data visualizations like the above present problems for qualitative researchers because they involve data about more users than can feasibly give consent, and they also involve giving over more control in the research process to tools, APIs, and algorithms, while ethical frameworks often assume a heavily orchestrated research process, with the researcher at the helm. This chapter addresses some of the ethical implications of visualizations utilizing data from social media platforms, drawing on material from two ongoing studies (one which follows nuclear controversies on e-mail lists and Facebook, and another about diet-related hashtags on Instagram). While we cannot hope to offer any programmatic or definitive statements on the matter, we will draw on some insights from Science and Technology Studies (STS) to highlight how ethical issues are distributed between different aspects of the research process and between different types of actors, including non-human algorithms and tools.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationInternet Research Ethics For The Social Age: New Cases and Challenges
EditorsMichael Zimmer, Katharina Kinder-Kurlanda
PublisherPeter Lang Publishing Group
Pages255-265
ISBN (Print)978-1-4331-4269-7
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How does it feel to be visualized? Redistributing Ethics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this