How environments speak: everyday mobilities, impersonal speech and the geographies of commentary

David Bissell*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    22 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This paper examines commentary as a mode of speaking that has not received sufficient attention by social and cultural geographers. In contrast to a representational understanding of commentary, where commentary is the expert interpretation of an environment, this paper develops a more passive understanding of commentary where the commentator is a figure through which the affective, material forces that constitute environments become expressed. Based on qualitative fieldwork in Sydney, Australia, the paper examines three modes of everyday commentary related to commuting. The commentaries of reportage, anecdote and autoventriloquy each demonstrate in different ways how the affective, material environments of commuting become spoken. The paper shows, first, how commentary is a constitutive rather than derivative aspect of the experience of commuting. Second, it shows that commentary is an expression of affective, material environments, rather than either the willed self-expression of the speaker, or the manifestation of socially and historically contingent discourses. Third, it shows that commentary can both close down and draw out specific affective, material environments. Fourth, it shows how commentary modulates the powers of existence in the zone of the commute, transforming the affective possibilities immanent to different situations.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)146-164
    Number of pages19
    JournalSocial and Cultural Geography
    Volume16
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 17 Feb 2015

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'How environments speak: everyday mobilities, impersonal speech and the geographies of commentary'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this