Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

How GPs value guidelines applied to patients with multimorbidity: A qualitative study

  • Hilde Luijks*
  • , Peter Lucassen
  • , Chris Van Weel
  • , Maartje Loeffen
  • , Antoine Lagro-Janssen
  • , Tjard Schermer
  • *Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

    38 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Objectives: To explore and describe the value general practitioner (GPs) attribute to medical guidelines when they are applied to patients with multimorbidity, and to describe which benefits GPs experience from guideline adherence in these patients. Also, we aimed to identify limitations from guideline adherence in patients with multimorbidity, as perceived by GPs, and to describe their empirical solutions to manage these obstacles. Design: Focus group study with purposive sampling of participants. Focus groups were guided by an experienced moderator who used an interview guide. Interviews were transcribed verbatim. Data analysis was performed by two researchers using the constant comparison analysis technique and field notes were used in the analysis. Data collection proceeded until saturation was reached. Setting: Primary care, eastern part of The Netherlands. Participants: Dutch GPs, heterogeneous in age, sex and academic involvement. Results: 25 GPs participated in five focus groups. GPs valued the guidance that guidelines provide, but experienced shortcomings when they were applied to patients with multimorbidity. Taking these patients' personal circumstances into account was regarded as important, but it was impeded by a consistent focus on guideline adherence. Preventative measures were considered less appropriate in (elderly) patients with multimorbidity. Moreover, the applicability of guidelines in patients with multimorbidity was questioned. GPs' extensive practical experience with managing multimorbidity resulted in several empirical solutions, for example, using their 'common sense' to respond to the perceived shortcomings. Conclusions: GPs applying guidelines for patients with multimorbidity integrate patient-specific factors in their medical decisions, aiming for patient-centred solutions. Such integration of clinical experience and best evidence is required to practise evidence-based medicine. More flexibility in pay-for-performance systems is needed to facilitate this integration. Several improvements in guideline reporting are necessary to enhance the applicability of guidelines in patients with multimorbidity.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article numbere007905
    Pages (from-to)1-7
    Number of pages8
    JournalBMJ Open
    Volume5
    Issue number10
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2015

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'How GPs value guidelines applied to patients with multimorbidity: A qualitative study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this