How International Nongovernmental Organizations Should Act

Thomas Pogge*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

    6 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This chapter proposes and critically discusses a principle that sets priorities for international nongovernmental organizations (INGOs) in a world where their resources fall short dramatically of the needs they seek to meet. Other things being equal, an INGO should govern its decision making about candidate projects by such rules and procedures as are expected to maximize its long-run cost-effectiveness, defined as the expected aggregate moral value of the projects it undertakes divided by the expected aggregate cost of these projects. Here, aggregate moral value, or harm protection, is the sum of the moral values of the harm reductions (and increases) these projects bring about for the individual persons they affect.

    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationGiving Well
    Subtitle of host publicationThe Ethics of Philanthropy
    PublisherOxford University Press
    ISBN (Electronic)9780199855872
    ISBN (Print)9780199739073
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2011

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'How International Nongovernmental Organizations Should Act'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this