TY - JOUR
T1 - How islamic has the “islamic state” been?
AU - Saikal, Amin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Institute of Muslim Minority Affairs.
PY - 2018/6/1
Y1 - 2018/6/1
N2 - Two principal views have emerged on the nature and operations of the so-called Islamic State or khilafat. One contends that IS had nothing to do with Islam in both its ideological disposition and practical operations. The other view claims that IS was the embodiment of a Salafist-Wahhabi version of Islam, and therefore it was Islamic. Whereas the first view recognizes the fact that Islam like any divine faith is open to a range of interpretations and applications, the second perspective has treated Islam as a monolithically adaptable doctrine, ignoring the diversity within the Muslim world.
AB - Two principal views have emerged on the nature and operations of the so-called Islamic State or khilafat. One contends that IS had nothing to do with Islam in both its ideological disposition and practical operations. The other view claims that IS was the embodiment of a Salafist-Wahhabi version of Islam, and therefore it was Islamic. Whereas the first view recognizes the fact that Islam like any divine faith is open to a range of interpretations and applications, the second perspective has treated Islam as a monolithically adaptable doctrine, ignoring the diversity within the Muslim world.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047787560&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/13602004.2018.1475620
DO - 10.1080/13602004.2018.1475620
M3 - Article
SN - 1360-2004
VL - 38
SP - 143
EP - 152
JO - Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs
JF - Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs
IS - 2
ER -