TY - JOUR
T1 - How MOOCs can empower learners
T2 - a comparison of provider goals and user experiences
AU - Longstaff, Emily
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 UCU.
PY - 2017/5/4
Y1 - 2017/5/4
N2 - The collective aims of the three biggest providers of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) are to promote anywhere, anytime learning; to increase access to world-class higher education; and to connect and empower learners. Through analysis of focus group discussions between MOOC participants at the Australian National University, this study shows that MOOCs do appear to empower some users, but perhaps not in the ways–or for the people–that providers had expected. Rather than simply producing a new means for disadvantaged groups to access higher education–which can, in turn, empower them to have more opportunities in social, political and economic avenues of life–even people who are already enrolled at university can be empowered, psychologically, by MOOCs to feel confident in their abilities and to try learning new things without fear of failure. The types of people most likely to be psychologically empowered by MOOCs are those who are intrinsically motivated to learn for learning’s sake and who are anxious about the prospect of failure with regards to academic credit and course fees. Conversely, those who are more driven by extrinsic rewards may be more suited to a formally-graded learning environment, where fear of failure and financial investment in learning are regarded as motivating rather than de-motivating forces. These findings suggest that, while they may not have the same impact on all participants, MOOCs can still be a beneficial education resource with an ability to empower even already well-educated members of society.
AB - The collective aims of the three biggest providers of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) are to promote anywhere, anytime learning; to increase access to world-class higher education; and to connect and empower learners. Through analysis of focus group discussions between MOOC participants at the Australian National University, this study shows that MOOCs do appear to empower some users, but perhaps not in the ways–or for the people–that providers had expected. Rather than simply producing a new means for disadvantaged groups to access higher education–which can, in turn, empower them to have more opportunities in social, political and economic avenues of life–even people who are already enrolled at university can be empowered, psychologically, by MOOCs to feel confident in their abilities and to try learning new things without fear of failure. The types of people most likely to be psychologically empowered by MOOCs are those who are intrinsically motivated to learn for learning’s sake and who are anxious about the prospect of failure with regards to academic credit and course fees. Conversely, those who are more driven by extrinsic rewards may be more suited to a formally-graded learning environment, where fear of failure and financial investment in learning are regarded as motivating rather than de-motivating forces. These findings suggest that, while they may not have the same impact on all participants, MOOCs can still be a beneficial education resource with an ability to empower even already well-educated members of society.
KW - MOOCs
KW - empower
KW - fear of failure
KW - learners
KW - provider goals
KW - user experiences
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84946926335&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/0309877X.2015.1100715
DO - 10.1080/0309877X.2015.1100715
M3 - Article
SN - 0309-877X
VL - 41
SP - 314
EP - 327
JO - Journal of Further and Higher Education
JF - Journal of Further and Higher Education
IS - 3
ER -