How our police erred on the side of capital punishment

Miriam Gani

Research output: Contribution to specialist publicationGeneral Article

Abstract

LAST week, the Indonesian Supreme Court increased the sentences of four of the socalled Bali Nine from 20 years to death. Responding to Australians' expressions of surprise and shock, the Prime Minister, John Howard, promised to appeal for clemency on their behalf - though only when all possible legal appeals have been exhausted. The outcome in the Indonesian Supreme Court has refocused attention on the case of Rush v Commissioner of Police, decided in the Federal Court of Australia in January. In Rush, the broad issue was the legality of the actions of the Australian Federal Police. It involved four of the Bali Nine seeking discovery of the identity of the officers who had passed on information about the activities of the four drug couriers to the Indonesian National Police.
Original languageEnglish
Pages13pp
No.Tuesday, 12 September 2006
Specialist publicationThe Canberra Times
Publication statusPublished - 2006

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How our police erred on the side of capital punishment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this