How to prove Hume’s Law

Gillian Russell

doi:10.1007/s10992-021-09643-3

How to prove Hume’s Law

Gillian Russell

School of Philosophy

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper proves a precisification of Hume’s Law—the thesis that one cannot get an ought from an is—as an instance of a more general theorem which establishes several other philosophically interesting, though less controversial, barriers to logical consequence.

Original language	English
Journal	Journal of Philosophical Logic
Volume	First Online
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-021-09643-3
Publication status	Published - 24 Nov 2021

Access to Document

10.1007/s10992-021-09643-3

Cite this

@article{16623c13c17044edbe31ce392f4d5311,

title = "How to prove Hume{\textquoteright}s Law",

abstract = "This paper proves a precisification of Hume{\textquoteright}s Law—the thesis that one cannot get an ought from an is—as an instance of a more general theorem which establishes several other philosophically interesting, though less controversial, barriers to logical consequence.",

keywords = "Hume{\textquoteright}s Law, Barriers to entailment, Philosophical logic, Invalidity, Logical consequence",

author = "Gillian Russell",

year = "2021",

month = nov,

day = "24",

doi = "10.1007/s10992-021-09643-3",

language = "English",

volume = "First Online",

journal = "Journal of Philosophical Logic",

issn = "0022-3611",

publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How to prove Hume’s Law

AU - Russell, Gillian

PY - 2021/11/24

Y1 - 2021/11/24

N2 - This paper proves a precisification of Hume’s Law—the thesis that one cannot get an ought from an is—as an instance of a more general theorem which establishes several other philosophically interesting, though less controversial, barriers to logical consequence.

AB - This paper proves a precisification of Hume’s Law—the thesis that one cannot get an ought from an is—as an instance of a more general theorem which establishes several other philosophically interesting, though less controversial, barriers to logical consequence.

KW - Hume’s Law

KW - Barriers to entailment

KW - Philosophical logic

KW - Invalidity

KW - Logical consequence

U2 - 10.1007/s10992-021-09643-3

DO - 10.1007/s10992-021-09643-3

M3 - Article

SN - 0022-3611

VL - First Online

JO - Journal of Philosophical Logic

JF - Journal of Philosophical Logic

ER -

How to prove Hume’s Law

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this