TY - JOUR
T1 - How to quantify (the response to) sexual selection on traits
AU - Henshaw, Jonathan M.
AU - Jennions, Michael D.
AU - Kruuk, Loeske E.B.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 The Author(s). Evolution © 2018 The Society for the Study of Evolution.
PY - 2018/9
Y1 - 2018/9
N2 - Natural selection operates via fitness components like mating success, fecundity, and longevity, which can be understood as intermediaries in the causal process linking traits to fitness. In particular, sexual selection occurs when traits influence mating or fertilization success, which, in turn, influences fitness. We show how to quantify both these steps in a single path analysis, leading to better estimates of the strength of sexual selection. Our model controls for confounding variables, such as body size or condition, when estimating the relationship between mating and reproductive success. Correspondingly, we define the Bateman gradient and the Jones index using partial rather than simple regressions, which better captures how they are commonly interpreted. The model can be applied both to purely phenotypic data and to quantitative genetic parameters estimated using information on relatedness. The phenotypic approach breaks down selection differentials into a sexually selected and a “remainder” component. The quantitative genetic approach decomposes the estimated evolutionary response to selection analogously. We apply our method to analyze sexual selection in male dusky pipefish, Syngnathus floridae, and in two simulated datasets. We highlight conceptual and statistical limitations of previous path-based approaches, which can lead to substantial misestimation of sexual selection.
AB - Natural selection operates via fitness components like mating success, fecundity, and longevity, which can be understood as intermediaries in the causal process linking traits to fitness. In particular, sexual selection occurs when traits influence mating or fertilization success, which, in turn, influences fitness. We show how to quantify both these steps in a single path analysis, leading to better estimates of the strength of sexual selection. Our model controls for confounding variables, such as body size or condition, when estimating the relationship between mating and reproductive success. Correspondingly, we define the Bateman gradient and the Jones index using partial rather than simple regressions, which better captures how they are commonly interpreted. The model can be applied both to purely phenotypic data and to quantitative genetic parameters estimated using information on relatedness. The phenotypic approach breaks down selection differentials into a sexually selected and a “remainder” component. The quantitative genetic approach decomposes the estimated evolutionary response to selection analogously. We apply our method to analyze sexual selection in male dusky pipefish, Syngnathus floridae, and in two simulated datasets. We highlight conceptual and statistical limitations of previous path-based approaches, which can lead to substantial misestimation of sexual selection.
KW - Animal model
KW - Robertson's secondary theorem of selection
KW - opportunity for sexual selection
KW - quantitative genetics
KW - selection gradient
KW - structural equation modeling
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051114202&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/evo.13554
DO - 10.1111/evo.13554
M3 - Article
SN - 0014-3820
VL - 72
SP - 1904
EP - 1917
JO - Evolution
JF - Evolution
IS - 9
ER -