Human rights, power and welfare conditionality

Ann Nevile*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    13 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Over the last 10 to 15 years, talk about economic and social rights has become part of social policy debates in developed countries. Rights-based approaches emphasise participation, yet the debate around economic and social rights is largely driven from above. This article examines the extent to which the values which underpin rights-based approaches are consistent with the values of those whom such an approach is designed to help. The values underlying rights-based approaches and those with experience of poverty are identified and then compared in three ways: in general; in relation to the specific issue of welfare conditionality; and as prescriptions for action. The comparative analysis is facilitated by linking the discussion of values to discussion of the forms of power relationships involved in rights-based approaches and what is valued by those with experience of poverty. While there is considerable overlap between rights-based approaches and what is valued by those with experience of poverty, there are also subtle differences which should not be ignored.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1-20
    Number of pages20
    JournalAustralian Journal of Human Rights
    Volume14
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2008

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Human rights, power and welfare conditionality'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this