TY - JOUR
T1 - Identification and evaluation of clinically significant prostate cancer
T2 - A step towards personalized diagnosis
AU - Ali, Adnan
AU - Hoyle, Alexander
AU - Baena, Esther
AU - Clarke, Noel W.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2017/5/1
Y1 - 2017/5/1
N2 - Purpose of review Prostate cancer (PCa) diagnostics are evolving rapidly. The quest to differentiate 'clinically significant' from 'clinically insignificant' disease has gathered momentum, leading to substantial change in traditional diagnostic approaches. Herein, we review the relevant information on currently available biomarkers and assess their ability to help physicians and patients in making a shared and personalized decision based on their individual risk of harbouring clinically significant disease. Recent findings Serum, urine, tissue and imaging biomarkers have been evaluated to improve the identification of clinically significant disease, and this international effort has yielded promising, but not always consistent results. Changes in MRI technology have realized a quantum change, and this facility is now becoming more widely incorporated into diagnostic and disease risk-stratification protocols. However, standardization and further validation is required. Summary Acceptance and widespread adoption of serum, urine and genetic markers is awaited, but novel and promising techniques alone and in combination have emerged. With validation and further focus, these may be adopted more widely.
AB - Purpose of review Prostate cancer (PCa) diagnostics are evolving rapidly. The quest to differentiate 'clinically significant' from 'clinically insignificant' disease has gathered momentum, leading to substantial change in traditional diagnostic approaches. Herein, we review the relevant information on currently available biomarkers and assess their ability to help physicians and patients in making a shared and personalized decision based on their individual risk of harbouring clinically significant disease. Recent findings Serum, urine, tissue and imaging biomarkers have been evaluated to improve the identification of clinically significant disease, and this international effort has yielded promising, but not always consistent results. Changes in MRI technology have realized a quantum change, and this facility is now becoming more widely incorporated into diagnostic and disease risk-stratification protocols. However, standardization and further validation is required. Summary Acceptance and widespread adoption of serum, urine and genetic markers is awaited, but novel and promising techniques alone and in combination have emerged. With validation and further focus, these may be adopted more widely.
KW - biomarkers
KW - genomics
KW - multiparametric MRI
KW - prostate cancer
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85013113145&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000385
DO - 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000385
M3 - Review article
C2 - 28212121
AN - SCOPUS:85013113145
SN - 0963-0643
VL - 27
SP - 217
EP - 224
JO - Current Opinion in Urology
JF - Current Opinion in Urology
IS - 3
ER -