Immoral authorities: Crusades, jihād and just war rhetoric

Michele Acuto*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    This paper highlights the relevance of moral authority, and the role that egoistic ethical claims have in waging war. This is done, in view of the just war tradition, by drawing a parallel between the crusades in the 'kingdom of heaven' proclaimed in 1095, and the present Islamic jihad, as well as the Bush administration's declaration of a war on terror. It maintains that the role of self-legitimized leaders is crucial in shaping the order of the jus ad bellum criteria, in both Christian and Muslim societies, and that the indiscriminate usage of just war rhetoric proves to be a formidable weapon. Moral authority is described as a power resource, capable of capsizing the relevance of ethics, subjecting the interpretation of justice to declare war to the self-proclaimed authorities, and moving masses on the grounds of enthusiasm.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)17-26
    Number of pages10
    JournalJournal of Global Ethics
    Volume6
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Apr 2010

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Immoral authorities: Crusades, jihād and just war rhetoric'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this