Imperial chinese relations with nomadic groups

Joseph MacKay*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This chapter assesses the nomad-sedentary interface in the long-run context of Imperial China. I focus on the late imperial Ming and Qing dynasties. I identify three distinct ideal-type forms of nomadic groups. The first comprises the nomadic peoples of the Inner Asian Steppe, which confronted China on its non-Western frontier, and which occasionally constituted themselves as rival empires. The second comprises the smaller upland nomadic and migratory peoples, chiefly on China’s southern peripheries. These were not threats per se, but were still habitually constructed as “others” by the Chinese state. The third group, not traditionally, parsed as nomads, were pirates: seagoing social groupings on China’s southeastern coastlines that occasionally organized themselves at scale, controlling territory, levying taxes, and praying on the rural margins of the Chinese state. By degrees, successive dynasties proved adept at regulating relations with all three-likely doing so with greater flexibility than modern states.

    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationNomad-State Relationships in International Relations
    Subtitle of host publicationBefore and After Borders
    PublisherPalgrave Macmillan
    Pages197-216
    Number of pages20
    ISBN (Electronic)9783030280536
    ISBN (Print)9783030280529
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2020

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Imperial chinese relations with nomadic groups'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this