Implications of Dedicated Seismometer Measurements on Newtonian-Noise Cancellation for Advanced LIGO

M. W. Coughlin, J. Harms, J. Driggers, D. J. McManus, N. Mukund, M. P. Ross, B. J.J. Slagmolen, K. Venkateswara

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    37 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Newtonian gravitational noise from seismic fields will become a limiting noise source at low frequency for second-generation, gravitational-wave detectors. It is planned to use seismic sensors surrounding the detectors' test masses to coherently subtract Newtonian noise using Wiener filters derived from the correlations between the sensors and detector data. In this Letter, we use data from a seismometer array deployed at the corner station of the Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory (LIGO) Hanford detector combined with a tiltmeter for a detailed characterization of the seismic field and to predict achievable Newtonian-noise subtraction levels. As was shown previously, cancellation of the tiltmeter signal using seismometer data serves as the best available proxy of Newtonian-noise cancellation. According to our results, a relatively small number of seismometers is likely sufficient to perform the noise cancellation due to an almost ideal two-point spatial correlation of seismic surface displacement at the corner station, or alternatively, a tiltmeter deployed under each of the two test masses of the corner station at Hanford will be able to efficiently cancel Newtonian noise. Furthermore, we show that the ground tilt to differential arm-length coupling observed during LIGO's second science run is consistent with gravitational coupling.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number221104
    JournalPhysical Review Letters
    Volume121
    Issue number22
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 28 Nov 2018

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Implications of Dedicated Seismometer Measurements on Newtonian-Noise Cancellation for Advanced LIGO'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this