Implications of structure versus agency for addressing health and well-being in our ecologically constrained world: With a focus on prospects for gender equity

Helen L. Walls, Colin D. Butler, Jane Dixon, Indira Samarawickrema

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

    4 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The long-standing debate in public health and the wider society concerning the implications of structure and agency for health and well-being generally concludes that structure powerfully influences agency, and does so unequally, exacerbating social and health inequities. In this article, we review this debate in the context of increasing environmental degradation and resource depletion. As the global population rises and environmental resources per person shrink, conflicts over the underlying factors contributing to human health and well-being may intensify. A likely result of nearing limits is a further constraint of agency, for both rich and poor, and greater social and health inequities, including gender inequities.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)47-69
    Number of pages23
    JournalInternational Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics
    Volume8
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Sept 2015

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Implications of structure versus agency for addressing health and well-being in our ecologically constrained world: With a focus on prospects for gender equity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this