In Australia’s China “debate”, there is no monopoly on morality

Iain D. Henry

In Australia’s China “debate”, there is no monopoly on morality

Strategic & Defence Studies Centre

Research output: Contribution to specialist publication › General Article

Abstract

It would be tragic if anger at China’s sins prompted Australia
to adopt policies making even greater misery more likely.

Original language	English
Specialist publication	The Interpreter
Publisher	Lowy Institute
Publication status	Published - 13 Dec 2019

Access to Document

https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/australia-s-china-debate-there-no-monopoly-morality

Cite this

@misc{b86731dc0546485686d4870a07bb39c3,

title = "In Australia{\textquoteright}s China “debate”, there is no monopoly on morality",

abstract = "It would be tragic if anger at China{\textquoteright}s sins prompted Australia to adopt policies making even greater misery more likely.",

author = "Henry, \{Iain D.\}",

year = "2019",

month = dec,

day = "13",

language = "English",

journal = "The Interpreter",

publisher = "Lowy Institute",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - In Australia’s China “debate”, there is no monopoly on morality

AU - Henry, Iain D.

PY - 2019/12/13

Y1 - 2019/12/13

N2 - It would be tragic if anger at China’s sins prompted Australia to adopt policies making even greater misery more likely.

AB - It would be tragic if anger at China’s sins prompted Australia to adopt policies making even greater misery more likely.

M3 - General Article

JO - The Interpreter

JF - The Interpreter

PB - Lowy Institute

ER -

In Australia’s China “debate”, there is no monopoly on morality

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this