TY - JOUR
T1 - In search of the missing middle
AU - Ravenhill, John
PY - 2008/2
Y1 - 2008/2
N2 - In a recent article in RIPE, Benjamin J. Cohen suggests that a deep divide exists between two schools of IPE: the American and the British. While, at a certain level of generality, obvious differences do exist between how international relations generally, and IPE more specifically, are studied in the US and the UK, various dimensions of Cohen's argument are problematic, and may inadvertently hinder his professed desire to build bridges across the Atlantic. In particular, Cohen's approach is ambiguous as to exactly what the defining characteristics of the 'British' approach are, appears to conflate different traditions of theorizing, and presents a very narrow characterization of the field of IPE in the United States.
AB - In a recent article in RIPE, Benjamin J. Cohen suggests that a deep divide exists between two schools of IPE: the American and the British. While, at a certain level of generality, obvious differences do exist between how international relations generally, and IPE more specifically, are studied in the US and the UK, various dimensions of Cohen's argument are problematic, and may inadvertently hinder his professed desire to build bridges across the Atlantic. In particular, Cohen's approach is ambiguous as to exactly what the defining characteristics of the 'British' approach are, appears to conflate different traditions of theorizing, and presents a very narrow characterization of the field of IPE in the United States.
KW - Critical approaches
KW - IPE
KW - Methodology
KW - Ontology
KW - Rational choice
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/37049019044
U2 - 10.1080/09692290701751258
DO - 10.1080/09692290701751258
M3 - Article
SN - 0969-2290
VL - 15
SP - 18
EP - 29
JO - Review of International Political Economy
JF - Review of International Political Economy
IS - 1
ER -