In what sense are prejudicial beliefs personal? The importance of an in-groups shared stereotypes

S A Haslam, Anastasia Wilson

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    This experiment investigated the role that group membership and shared stereotypes play in the expression of intergroup prejudice. In three independent conditions schoolchildren (N = 96) used a checklist to describe Australian Aborigines with reference to the cultural stereotype and their personal beliefs. In two conditions Aborigines were also described with reference to the beliefs of a relevant in-group (with or without group interaction). In all conditions an independent prejudice measure was also completed. Following Devine and Elliot (1995), personal beliefs were always better predictors of prejudice than the cultural stereotype. However, shared group beliefs were better predictors of prejudice than personal beliefs elicited in the abstract, and personal beliefs were more predictive of prejudice in conditions where they were informed by a salient group membership. These patterns suggest that personal beliefs are more predictive of prejudice when they reflect stereotypic beliefs shared within an in-group rather than individuals' idiosyncratic views.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)45-63
    JournalBritish Journal of Social Psychology
    Volume39
    Publication statusPublished - 2000

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'In what sense are prejudicial beliefs personal? The importance of an in-groups shared stereotypes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this