TY - JOUR
T1 - Incidence of Stroke in Indigenous Populations of Countries With a Very High Human Development Index A Systematic Review
AU - Balabanski, Anna H.
AU - Dos Santos, Angela
AU - Woods, John A.
AU - Mutimer, Chloe A.
AU - Thrift, Amanda G.
AU - Kleinig, Timothy J.
AU - Suchy-Dicey, Astrid M.
AU - Siri, Susanna Ragnhild A.
AU - Boden-Albala, Bernadette
AU - Krishnamurthi, Rita V.
AU - Feigin, Valery L.
AU - Buchwald, Dedra
AU - Ranta, Annemarei
AU - Mienna, Christina S.
AU - Zavaleta-Cortijo, Carol
AU - Churilov, Leonid
AU - Burchill, Luke
AU - Zion, Deborah
AU - Longstreth, W. T.
AU - Tirschwell, David L.
AU - Anand, Sonia S.
AU - Parsons, Mark W.
AU - Brown, Alex
AU - Warne, Donald K.
AU - Harwood, Matire
AU - Barber, P. Alan
AU - Katzenellenbogen, Judith M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 American Academy of Neurology.
PY - 2024/2/13
Y1 - 2024/2/13
N2 - Background and Objectives Cardiovascular disease contributes significantly to disease burden among many Indigenous populations. However, data on stroke incidence in Indigenous populations are sparse. We aimed to investigate what is known of stroke incidence in Indigenous populations of countries with a very high Human Development Index (HDI), locating the research in the broader context of Indigenous health. Methods We identified population-based stroke incidence studies published between 1990 and 2022 among Indigenous adult populations of developed countries using PubMed, Embase, and Global Health databases, without language restriction. We excluded non–peer-reviewed sources, studies with fewer than 10 Indigenous people, or not covering a 35- to 64-year minimum age range. Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full-text articles and extracted data. We assessed quality using “gold standard” criteria for population-based stroke incidence studies, the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for risk of bias, and CONSIDER criteria for reporting of Indigenous health research. An Indigenous Advisory Board provided oversight for the study. Results From 13,041 publications screened, 24 studies (19 full-text articles, 5 abstracts) from 7 countries met the inclusion criteria. Age-standardized stroke incidence rate ratios were greater in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians (1.7–3.2), American Indians (1.2), Sámi of Sweden/Norway (1.08–2.14), and Singaporean Malay (1.7–1.9), compared with respective non-Indigenous populations. Studies had substantial heterogeneity in design and risk of bias. Attack rates, male-female rate ratios, and time trends are reported where available. Few investigators reported Indigenous stakeholder involvement, with few studies meeting any of the CONSIDER criteria for research among Indigenous populations. Discussion In countries with a very high HDI, there are notable, albeit varying, disparities in stroke incidence between Indigenous and non-Indigenous populations, although there are gaps in data availability and quality. A greater understanding of stroke incidence is imperative for informing effective societal responses to socioeconomic and health disparities in these populations. Future studies into stroke incidence in Indigenous populations should be designed and conducted with Indigenous oversight and governance to facilitate improved outcomes and capacity building.
AB - Background and Objectives Cardiovascular disease contributes significantly to disease burden among many Indigenous populations. However, data on stroke incidence in Indigenous populations are sparse. We aimed to investigate what is known of stroke incidence in Indigenous populations of countries with a very high Human Development Index (HDI), locating the research in the broader context of Indigenous health. Methods We identified population-based stroke incidence studies published between 1990 and 2022 among Indigenous adult populations of developed countries using PubMed, Embase, and Global Health databases, without language restriction. We excluded non–peer-reviewed sources, studies with fewer than 10 Indigenous people, or not covering a 35- to 64-year minimum age range. Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full-text articles and extracted data. We assessed quality using “gold standard” criteria for population-based stroke incidence studies, the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for risk of bias, and CONSIDER criteria for reporting of Indigenous health research. An Indigenous Advisory Board provided oversight for the study. Results From 13,041 publications screened, 24 studies (19 full-text articles, 5 abstracts) from 7 countries met the inclusion criteria. Age-standardized stroke incidence rate ratios were greater in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians (1.7–3.2), American Indians (1.2), Sámi of Sweden/Norway (1.08–2.14), and Singaporean Malay (1.7–1.9), compared with respective non-Indigenous populations. Studies had substantial heterogeneity in design and risk of bias. Attack rates, male-female rate ratios, and time trends are reported where available. Few investigators reported Indigenous stakeholder involvement, with few studies meeting any of the CONSIDER criteria for research among Indigenous populations. Discussion In countries with a very high HDI, there are notable, albeit varying, disparities in stroke incidence between Indigenous and non-Indigenous populations, although there are gaps in data availability and quality. A greater understanding of stroke incidence is imperative for informing effective societal responses to socioeconomic and health disparities in these populations. Future studies into stroke incidence in Indigenous populations should be designed and conducted with Indigenous oversight and governance to facilitate improved outcomes and capacity building.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85207152584&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1212/WNL.0000000000209138
DO - 10.1212/WNL.0000000000209138
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85207152584
SN - 0028-3878
VL - 102
JO - Neurology
JF - Neurology
IS - 5
M1 - e209138
ER -