Increasing brain-computer interface media depictions: pressing ethical concerns

F. Gilbert*, C. Pham, Jnm Viaña, W. Gillam

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article explores how brain-computer interfaces (BCI) are depicted in the English-speaking media, especially by news outlets. We use the FACTICA database to analyze depictions of BCIs from the first time the term appeared in the media (1993) up until 31 December 2017. We found a sample of over 4064 articles on BCIs. Results indicate that 76.91% of articles portrayed BCI positively, including 25.27% that were overly positive, while 26.64 % of the total articles contain claims about BCI-enabled enhancement. In contrast, 1.6% of articles had a negative tone and only 2.7% of articles flag issues explicitly related to ethical concerns surrounding BCI technology. We propose: 1) A proactive effort by the scientific community to push-out to the media stories focused on the limits and actual capabilities of BCIs, separating science from science fiction; 2) More influence should be brought to bear on the technological risks and process of informed consent.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)49-70
Number of pages22
JournalBrain-Computer Interfaces
Volume6
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Jul 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Increasing brain-computer interface media depictions: pressing ethical concerns'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this