Injecting fun? Humour, conspiracy theory and (anti)vaccination discourse in popular media

Anastasiya Fiadotava*, Anastasiya Astapova, Rebecca Hendershott, Merryn McKinnon, Anna Sophie Jürgens

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Conspiracy theories have accompanied vaccination since its mass introduction, circulating, among other forms, in humour – such as cartoons, and now, memes. Importantly, humour has targeted both vaccination and anti-vaccination stances. In this study, we discuss the peculiarities of humorous content within the vaccination debate and uncover the most popular thematic categories, forms and logical mechanisms of humour. We show that humorous and serious discussions on vaccination go hand-in-hand, but playfulness and ambiguity of humour complicate public understanding of the vaccination debate. Our analysis shows that vaccination humour often simplifies the complex issue of vaccination and makes it more understandable and more tangible for a broad audience.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)622-640
Number of pages19
JournalPublic Understanding of Science
Volume32
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Jan 2023

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Injecting fun? Humour, conspiracy theory and (anti)vaccination discourse in popular media'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this