Institutional maturity and challenges for integrity bodies

Ian Thynne

doi:10.1080/01442872.2011.601202

Institutional maturity and challenges for integrity bodies

Ian Thynne^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Integrity bodies, as monitoring and review authorities, are dualistic institutions acutely subject to the forces of integration and autonomy. They are usefully embraced by governance perspectives that suggest ascending levels of maturity through which all institutions can potentially progress. The perspectives and levels have distinctive features with inherent challenges ideally requiring the involvement of particular types of institutional leaders.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	37-47
Number of pages	11
Journal	Policy Studies
Volume	33
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2011.601202
Publication status	Published - Jan 2012

Access to Document

10.1080/01442872.2011.601202

Cite this

@article{4624d87354824d958965f89047767127,

title = "Institutional maturity and challenges for integrity bodies",

abstract = "Integrity bodies, as monitoring and review authorities, are dualistic institutions acutely subject to the forces of integration and autonomy. They are usefully embraced by governance perspectives that suggest ascending levels of maturity through which all institutions can potentially progress. The perspectives and levels have distinctive features with inherent challenges ideally requiring the involvement of particular types of institutional leaders.",

keywords = "challenges, governance, institutional maturity, integration and autonomy, integrity bodies, leaders and leadership, legitimacy",

author = "Ian Thynne",

year = "2012",

month = jan,

doi = "10.1080/01442872.2011.601202",

language = "English",

volume = "33",

pages = "37--47",

journal = "Policy Studies",

issn = "0144-2872",

publisher = "Routledge",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Institutional maturity and challenges for integrity bodies

AU - Thynne, Ian

PY - 2012/1

Y1 - 2012/1

N2 - Integrity bodies, as monitoring and review authorities, are dualistic institutions acutely subject to the forces of integration and autonomy. They are usefully embraced by governance perspectives that suggest ascending levels of maturity through which all institutions can potentially progress. The perspectives and levels have distinctive features with inherent challenges ideally requiring the involvement of particular types of institutional leaders.

AB - Integrity bodies, as monitoring and review authorities, are dualistic institutions acutely subject to the forces of integration and autonomy. They are usefully embraced by governance perspectives that suggest ascending levels of maturity through which all institutions can potentially progress. The perspectives and levels have distinctive features with inherent challenges ideally requiring the involvement of particular types of institutional leaders.

KW - challenges

KW - governance

KW - institutional maturity

KW - integration and autonomy

KW - integrity bodies

KW - leaders and leadership

KW - legitimacy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84857020898&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/01442872.2011.601202

DO - 10.1080/01442872.2011.601202

M3 - Article

SN - 0144-2872

VL - 33

SP - 37

EP - 47

JO - Policy Studies

JF - Policy Studies

IS - 1

ER -

Institutional maturity and challenges for integrity bodies

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this