Abstract
This paper examines in detail the quality of the relationship the Catholic Church in its Sydney Archdiocese had with its lawyers in the John Ellis matter as revealed in the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse inquiry. It identifies the particular moral perspective embedded in its lawyers' adversarial approach and asks whether a different approach involving explicit moral conversations might have better served the Church's avowed pastoral ethos.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 164-181 |
Number of pages | 18 |
Journal | Legal Ethics |
Volume | 18 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 3 Jul 2015 |