TY - JOUR
T1 - Institutions of deliberative democratic processes and interest groups
T2 - Roles, tensions and incentives
AU - Hendriks, Carolyn
PY - 2002/3
Y1 - 2002/3
N2 - There are inherent tensions between traditional, more pluralist forms of public participation and new deliberative democratic processes, such as citizens juries. These innovative processes, known collectively as citizens forums, challenge existing roles and power relationships between interest groups and the state. Instead of having key access to the policy stage, interest groups are required to be 'bystanders', 'information providers', and ultimately 'process legitimisers'. With such a radical shift in roles and power structure, there are few apparent reasons why interest groups would want to participate in such deliberative processes. In some cases, to the detriment of the process, they decide not to.
AB - There are inherent tensions between traditional, more pluralist forms of public participation and new deliberative democratic processes, such as citizens juries. These innovative processes, known collectively as citizens forums, challenge existing roles and power relationships between interest groups and the state. Instead of having key access to the policy stage, interest groups are required to be 'bystanders', 'information providers', and ultimately 'process legitimisers'. With such a radical shift in roles and power structure, there are few apparent reasons why interest groups would want to participate in such deliberative processes. In some cases, to the detriment of the process, they decide not to.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036005384&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/1467-8500.00259
DO - 10.1111/1467-8500.00259
M3 - Article
SN - 0313-6647
VL - 61
SP - 64
EP - 75
JO - Australian Journal of Public Administration
JF - Australian Journal of Public Administration
IS - 1
ER -