Institutions of deliberative democratic processes and interest groups: Roles, tensions and incentives

Carolyn Hendriks*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    87 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    There are inherent tensions between traditional, more pluralist forms of public participation and new deliberative democratic processes, such as citizens juries. These innovative processes, known collectively as citizens forums, challenge existing roles and power relationships between interest groups and the state. Instead of having key access to the policy stage, interest groups are required to be 'bystanders', 'information providers', and ultimately 'process legitimisers'. With such a radical shift in roles and power structure, there are few apparent reasons why interest groups would want to participate in such deliberative processes. In some cases, to the detriment of the process, they decide not to.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)64-75
    Number of pages12
    JournalAustralian Journal of Public Administration
    Volume61
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Mar 2002

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Institutions of deliberative democratic processes and interest groups: Roles, tensions and incentives'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this