Abstract
There are inherent tensions between traditional, more pluralist forms of public participation and new deliberative democratic processes, such as citizens juries. These innovative processes, known collectively as citizens forums, challenge existing roles and power relationships between interest groups and the state. Instead of having key access to the policy stage, interest groups are required to be 'bystanders', 'information providers', and ultimately 'process legitimisers'. With such a radical shift in roles and power structure, there are few apparent reasons why interest groups would want to participate in such deliberative processes. In some cases, to the detriment of the process, they decide not to.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 64-75 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Australian Journal of Public Administration |
| Volume | 61 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Mar 2002 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Institutions of deliberative democratic processes and interest groups: Roles, tensions and incentives'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver