TY - JOUR
T1 - Intensive care discharge delay is associated with increased hospital length of stay
T2 - A multicentre prospective observational study
AU - Tiruvoipati, Ravindranath
AU - Botha, John
AU - Fletcher, Jason
AU - Gangopadhyay, Himangsu
AU - Majumdar, Mainak
AU - Vij, Sanjiv
AU - Paul, Eldho
AU - Pilcher, David
AU - French, Craig
AU - McArthur, Colin
AU - Peake, Sandra
AU - Parke, Rachael
AU - Gattas, David
AU - Saxena, Manoj
AU - Young, Paul
AU - Cohen, Jeremy
AU - Deane, Adam
AU - Cooper, David
AU - Udy, Andrew
AU - Litton, Ed
AU - Erickson, Simon
AU - Mitchell, Imogen
AU - Eastwood, Glenn
AU - Goldsmith, Donna
AU - Rickerby, Simone
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Tiruvoipati et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
PY - 2017/7
Y1 - 2017/7
N2 - Background: Some patients experience a delayed discharge from the intensive care unit (ICU) where the intended and actual discharge times do not coincide. The clinical implications of this remain unclear. Objective: To determine the incidence and duration of delayed ICU discharge, identify the reasons for delay and evaluate the clinical consequences. Methods: Prospective multi-centre observational study involving five ICUs over a 3-month period. Delay in discharge was defined as >6 hours from the planned discharge time. The primary outcome measure was hospital length stay after ICU discharge decision. Secondary outcome measures included ICU discharge after-hours, incidence of delirium, survival to hospital discharge, discharge destination, the incidence of ICU acquired infections, revocation of ICU discharge decision, unplanned readmissions to ICU within 72 hours, review of patients admitting team after ICU discharge decision. Results: A total of 955 out of 1118 patients discharged were included in analysis. 49.9% of the patients discharge was delayed. The most common reason (74%) for delay in discharge was non-availability of ward bed. The median duration of the delay was 24 hours. On univariable analysis, the duration of hospital stay from the time of ICU discharge decision was significantly higher in patients who had ICU discharge delay (Median days-5 vs 6; p = 0.003). After-hours discharge was higher in patients whose discharge was delayed (34% Vs 10%; p<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the other secondary outcomes analysed. Multivariable analysis adjusting for known confounders revealed delayed ICU discharge was independently associated with increased hospital length of stay. Conclusion: Half of all ICU patients experienced a delay in ICU discharge. Delayed discharge was associated with increased hospital length of stay.
AB - Background: Some patients experience a delayed discharge from the intensive care unit (ICU) where the intended and actual discharge times do not coincide. The clinical implications of this remain unclear. Objective: To determine the incidence and duration of delayed ICU discharge, identify the reasons for delay and evaluate the clinical consequences. Methods: Prospective multi-centre observational study involving five ICUs over a 3-month period. Delay in discharge was defined as >6 hours from the planned discharge time. The primary outcome measure was hospital length stay after ICU discharge decision. Secondary outcome measures included ICU discharge after-hours, incidence of delirium, survival to hospital discharge, discharge destination, the incidence of ICU acquired infections, revocation of ICU discharge decision, unplanned readmissions to ICU within 72 hours, review of patients admitting team after ICU discharge decision. Results: A total of 955 out of 1118 patients discharged were included in analysis. 49.9% of the patients discharge was delayed. The most common reason (74%) for delay in discharge was non-availability of ward bed. The median duration of the delay was 24 hours. On univariable analysis, the duration of hospital stay from the time of ICU discharge decision was significantly higher in patients who had ICU discharge delay (Median days-5 vs 6; p = 0.003). After-hours discharge was higher in patients whose discharge was delayed (34% Vs 10%; p<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the other secondary outcomes analysed. Multivariable analysis adjusting for known confounders revealed delayed ICU discharge was independently associated with increased hospital length of stay. Conclusion: Half of all ICU patients experienced a delay in ICU discharge. Delayed discharge was associated with increased hospital length of stay.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85026674118&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0181827
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0181827
M3 - Article
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 12
JO - PLoS ONE
JF - PLoS ONE
IS - 7
M1 - e0181827
ER -