Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Intention to contract: Public act or private sentiment?

  • Margaret Thornton*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

In this chapter, the author first considers the nature of the transition that has occurred from will theory to objectivism, with particular regard to commercial contracts. Secondly, she regards to the marriage contract, which is a very curious type of contract because of its status, or non-negotiable, elements. Thirdly, the author interrogates the resistance towards domestic contractualism. The contemporary legal approach to contract is significantly more pragmatic and purposive than that suggested by will theory. The conjunction of the Christian idea of marriage as a sacrament and the ascendancy of the will theory of contract contributed to the view that marriage was the most perfect form of contract. In view of the vagaries surrounding entry into marriage, the extent to which contractualism within marriage is permitted has remained uncertain, although greater autonomy is accorded the parties on breakdown of marriage.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationIntention in Law and Philosophy
PublisherTaylor and Francis - Balkema
Pages217-237
Number of pages21
ISBN (Electronic)9781351739191
ISBN (Print)9781138734654
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Intention to contract: Public act or private sentiment?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this