Inter-block information: to recover or not to recover it?

Jens Möhring, Emlyn Williams, Hans Peter Piepho*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    21 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Key message: Comparing standard errors of treatment differences using fixed or random block effects with the approximation of Kackar and Harville helps in choosing the preferable assumption for blocks in the analysis of field experiments. Abstract: Blocked designs are common in plant breeding field trials. Depending on the precision of variance estimates, recovery of inter-block information via random block effects may be worthwhile. A challenge in practice is to decide when recovery of information should be pursued. To investigate this question, a series of sugar beet trials laid out as α-designs were analysed assuming fixed or random block effects. Additionally, small trials laid out as α-designs or partially replicated designs were simulated and analysed assuming fixed or random block effects. Nine decision rules, including the Kackar–Harville adjustment, were used for choosing the better assumption regarding the block effects. In general, use of the Kackar–Harville adjustment works well and is recommended for partially replicated designs. For α-designs, using inter-block information is preferable for designs with four or more blocks.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1541-1554
    Number of pages14
    JournalTheoretical And Applied Genetics
    Volume128
    Issue number8
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 24 Aug 2015

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Inter-block information: to recover or not to recover it?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this