TY - JOUR
T1 - Interfraction movement and clinical outcome of immobilization for thoracic irradiation
T2 - A randomized controlled trial
AU - Pulvirenti, Trish
AU - Agustin, Cherry
AU - Tamas, Monica
AU - Harris, Jillian
AU - Verning, Maria
AU - Cross, Shamira
AU - Jayamohan, Jayasingham
AU - Yeghiaian-Alvandi, Roland
AU - Gebski, Val
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 The Authors. Precision Radiation Oncology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Shandong Cancer Hospital & Institute.
PY - 2018/3/1
Y1 - 2018/3/1
N2 - Objective: To evaluate the impact of immobilization on set-up errors and clinical outcomes in patients receiving radiation therapy to the thorax. Methods: Patients receiving curative intent radiation therapy to the lung and esophagus were randomized to no immobilization (control) or immobilization (chest jig or vacuum bag), and treatment verification images were acquired within 3 days of commencing treatment and then weekly. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients having a deviation >5 mm from the isocenter. Assessment was carried out blinded to immobilization assignment. Results: Of the 77 patients, 75 patients were allocated to either immobilization or control. No statistical difference in the proportion of patients with bony displacements >5 mm from the isocenter were observed (P = 0.5), as was the case for both systematic and random errors between the groups. There was an increased risk of local failure in the immobilized control group (HR 1.46, 95% CI 0.78–2.71, P = 0.23) based on a competing risk analysis. The median overall survival was 18.4 months and 27.0 months in the control and immobilized groups, respectively (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.51–1.04, P = 0.08). Conclusions: The results failed to show benefit with immobilization in reducing set-up errors, local control, and overall survival.
AB - Objective: To evaluate the impact of immobilization on set-up errors and clinical outcomes in patients receiving radiation therapy to the thorax. Methods: Patients receiving curative intent radiation therapy to the lung and esophagus were randomized to no immobilization (control) or immobilization (chest jig or vacuum bag), and treatment verification images were acquired within 3 days of commencing treatment and then weekly. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients having a deviation >5 mm from the isocenter. Assessment was carried out blinded to immobilization assignment. Results: Of the 77 patients, 75 patients were allocated to either immobilization or control. No statistical difference in the proportion of patients with bony displacements >5 mm from the isocenter were observed (P = 0.5), as was the case for both systematic and random errors between the groups. There was an increased risk of local failure in the immobilized control group (HR 1.46, 95% CI 0.78–2.71, P = 0.23) based on a competing risk analysis. The median overall survival was 18.4 months and 27.0 months in the control and immobilized groups, respectively (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.51–1.04, P = 0.08). Conclusions: The results failed to show benefit with immobilization in reducing set-up errors, local control, and overall survival.
KW - chest
KW - immobilization
KW - radiation therapy
KW - randomized controlled trial
KW - thorax
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072154390&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/pro6.35
DO - 10.1002/pro6.35
M3 - Article
SN - 2398-7324
VL - 2
SP - 4
EP - 10
JO - Precision Radiation Oncology
JF - Precision Radiation Oncology
IS - 1
ER -