Intergroup relations and Muslims' mental health in Western societies: Australia as a case study

Sally Kalek*, Anita S. Mak, Nigar G. Khawaja

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    13 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This review article proposes that theories and research of intergroup contact, prejudice, and acculturation enhance understanding of the current intercultural relations between Muslims and non-Muslims in Western societies such as in Australia. The actual and perceived prejudice that many Muslims who study, work, and live in the West have experienced following the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks adds an additional layer of stress to the psychosocial adjustment of Muslim immigrants and sojourners, affecting their cross-cultural adaptation and mental health. Stephan and colleagues' integrated threat theory argued that the perceived threat experienced by all parties explains the acts of prejudice. Berry's acculturation framework highlighted that adaptive acculturation is determined by congruent host nation policies and practices and immigrant acculturation strategies. Implications for multicultural policy, intercultural training, and mental health practice as well as suggestions for future research are discussed.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)160-193
    Number of pages34
    JournalJournal of Muslim Mental Health
    Volume5
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jun 2010

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Intergroup relations and Muslims' mental health in Western societies: Australia as a case study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this